Alpha This is a new service, still being built and tested, and it will have mistakes: please tell us about a problem.

Councils · South Norfolk District Council

Notice of Motions

Full council, 17 October 2022: a named vote on the motion, carried.

For 13, Against 0, Abstained 0.

Party in overall control of the council on the date: Conservative. Each councillor's party is the one the council recorded for them at the time.

Only one side of this vote could be read from the minutes. The others may be recorded in a form that couldn't be read, or not at all.

For (13)

From the minutes

es before claiming asylum in the UK. He agreed with the principle that if a person came to the UK illegally they should be treated differently from someone who had come via a legal route and he would vote against the motion. Cllr T Laidlaw explained that he would support the motion and suggested that some migrants simply wanted to live in a constitutional democracy and should be respected for this. Cllr Brown acknowledged that this was a complex issue. He reiterated that migrants were being held in large accommodation centres and that 400 organisations were opposed to the Act. He also noted that the UK took in fewer migrants than most other European nations and that legal routes should be opened up for migration to help develop and grow the economy. A recorded vote was then conducted as follows: Cllrs Amis, Bernard, Blundell, Brown, Burrill, Glover, Halls, Hudson, Laidlaw, Nuri-Nixon, Rowe, Spratt and Worley voted for the motion Cllrs Bills, Dearnley, Dewsbury, Duffin, Easter, Elliott, Ellis, Francis, Fuller, Hardy, Hornby, Hurn, Kemp, Kiddie, Knight, Legg, Mason Billig, Minsh

The item in the council's own minutes. Names are matched to the councillors listed at the meeting. The names of people who aren't councillors are removed.