Report of the South Cambridgeshire District Council Independent Remuneration Panel
Full council, 4 December 2025: a named vote, lost.
For 8, Against 19, Abstained 0.
Party in overall control of the council on the date: Liberal Democrats. Each councillor's party is the one the council recorded for them at the time.
For (8)
- Bunty Waters (Conservative)
- Dr Richard Williams (Conservative)
- Dr Shrobona Bhattacharya (Conservative)
- Graham Cone (Conservative)
- Heather Williams (Conservative)
- Lina Nieto (Conservative)
- Tom Bygott (Conservative)
- Daniel Lentell (Independent)
Against (19)
- Anna Bradnam (Liberal Democrats)
- Bill Handley (Liberal Democrats)
- Brian Milnes (Liberal Democrats)
- Bridget Smith (Liberal Democrats)
- Corinne Garvie (Liberal Democrats)
- Dr Aidan Van de Weyer (Liberal Democrats)
- Dr Lisa Redrup (Liberal Democrats)
- Eileen Wilson (Liberal Democrats)
- Henry Batchelor (Liberal Democrats)
- James Rixon (Liberal Democrats)
- John Batchelor (Liberal Democrats)
- Libby Earle (Liberal Democrats)
- Natalie Warren-Green (Liberal Democrats)
- Paul Bearpark (Liberal Democrats)
- Peter Sandford (Liberal Democrats)
- Sally Ann Hart (Liberal Democrats)
- Stephen Drew (Liberal Democrats)
- Sunita Hansraj (Liberal Democrats)
- Dr James Hobro Liberal (not matched to a member)
From the minutes
than backdating it from April 2026. The Council voted (8 voting in favour, 19 voting against, 1 abstaining from voting) on a second amendment submitted by Councillor Dan Lentell, which was defeated. Councillors In Favour: Dr Shrobona Bhattacharya, Tom Bygott, Graham Cone, Daniel Lentell, Lina Nieto, Bunty Waters, Dr Richard Williams, Heather Williams Councillors Against: Henry Batchelor, John Batchelor, Paul Bearpark, Anna Bradnam, Stephen Drew, Libby Earle, Corinne Garvie, Bill Handley, Sunita Hansraj, Sally Ann Hart, [name removed], Brian Milnes, Dr Lisa Redrup, James Rixon, Peter Sandford, Bridget Smith, [name removed] van de Weyer, Natalie Warren-Green, Eileen Wilson Councillors Abstaining: Helene Leeming During the course of the resumed debate on the recommendation as originally moved, the following key points were raised: · Some Members felt the discussion was inappropriate and argued allowan
The item in the council's own minutes. Names are matched to the councillors listed at the meeting. The names of people who aren't councillors are removed.