Alpha This is a new service, still being built and tested, and it will have mistakes: please tell us about a problem.

Councils · Durham County Council

Motions on Notice

Full council, 14 July 2021: a named vote on the amendment, carried.

For 60, Against 36, Abstained 0.

Party in overall control of the council on the date: No overall control. Each councillor's party is the one the council recorded for them at the time.

For (60)

Against (36)

From the minutes

and the potential cost impact on local police, fire service, health and other services budgets which may be used by the IRC are closely monitored and controlled. Councillor M McKeon requested a named vote For the Amendment Councillors Abley, Avery, Bainbridge, A Bell, C Bell, R Bell, Blakey, D Brown, Cairns, Cosslett, Coult, Duffy, Elmer, Freeman, Haney, Heaviside, Henderson, Holmes, Hood, Hopgood, Howey, Hunt, Hutchinson, Jackson, Jones, Jopling, Lines, Maddison, Martin, E Mavin, McDonnell, McGaun, Moist, Molloy, Nicholson, Oliver, Ormerod, Peeke, Potts, J Quinn, Reed, Richardson, M I Roberts, Robson, Rooney, Rowlandson, Savory, Scott, Shield, Shuttleworth, Simpson, Stead, Stelling, Sterling, Stoker, Stubbs, Sutton-Lloyd, Watson, Wilkes, and Zair. Against the Amendment Councillors Adam, Adcock-Forster, Andrews, J Atkinson, P Atkinson, A Batey, Binney, Chaplow, Crute, Deinali, Fenwick, Fletcher, Griffiths, Gunn, Hall, Henig, Higgins, Hovvels, Kennedy, Manchester, McKenna, McKeon, McLean, McMahon, Miller, Nicholls, Pringle, Purvis, S Quinn, Shaw, Surtees, Townsend, Varty, Waldock, M Wilson, and Wood. The Amendment was carried and therefore became the Substantive Motion. Upon a vote being taken the Substantive Motion was carried.

The item in the council's own minutes. Names are matched to the councillors listed at the meeting. The names of people who aren't councillors are removed.